Wednesday, April 23, 2008

The Future was Yesterday..this is for you!

Davidson Loehr, minister at Austin's First Unitarian Universalist Church

One, very enjoyable, hilarious and passionate blogger, The Future Was Yesterday, loathes fundamentalism. Does not particularly care for 'religion' and like most reasonable people, knows and appreciates the distinction between 'religion' and 'spirituality',people who like to control others using their respective Bibles or Korans, and people who quietly live their faith, being the true believer that they are and walking the talk.

I told TUA..that reminds me of Austin's own Davidson Loehr. He participated in a large study called "The Fundamentalist Project" that was sponsored by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. For five years, from '88 till '93, 100 scholars from around the world reported on their findings on fundamentalism. Here are some 5 basic commonalities between fundamentalism of ALL faiths, and I quote;

The fundamentalists' agenda starts with insistence that their rules must be made to apply to all people, and to all areas of life. There can be no separation of church and state, or of public and private areas of life. The rigid rules of God—and they never doubt that they and only they have got these right—must become the law of the land. Pat Robertson, again, has said that just as Supreme Court justices place a hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution, so they should also place a hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible. In Khomeini's Iran, and in the recent Taliban rule of Afghanistan, we saw how brutal and bloody this looks in real time.

The second agenda item is really at the top of the list, and it's vulgarly simple: Men are on top. Men are bigger and stronger, and they rule not only through physical strength but also and more importantly through their influence on the laws and rules of the land. Men set the boundaries. Men define the norms, and men enforce them. They also define women, and they define them through narrowly conceived biological functions. Women are to be supportive wives, mothers, and homemakers.

A third item follows from the others. (Indeed each part of the fundamentalist agenda is necessarily interlocked, and needs every other part to survive.) Since there is only one right picture of the world, one right set of beliefs, and one right set of roles for men, women, and children, it is imperative that this picture and these rules be communicated precisely to the next generation. Therefore, fundamentalists must control education by controlling textbooks and teaching styles, deciding what may and may not be taught.
Fourth, fundamentalists spurn the modern, and want to return to a nostalgic vision of a golden age that never really existed. Several of the scholars observed a strong and deep resemblance between fundamentalism and fascism. Both have almost identical agendas. Men are on top, women are subservient, there is one rigid set of rules, with police and military might to enforce them, and education is tightly controlled by the state. One scholar suggested that it's helpful to understand fundamentalism as religious fascism, and fascism as political fundamentalism. The phrase “overcoming the modern” is a fascist slogan dating back to at least 1941.

The fifth point is the most abstract, though it's foundational. Fundamentalists deny history in a radical and idiosyncratic way. Fundamentalists know as well or better than anybody that culture shapes everything it touches: The times we live in color how we think, what we value, and the kind of people we become. Fundamentalists agree on the perverseness of modern American society: the air of permissiveness and narcissism, individual rights unbalanced by responsibilities, sex divorced from commitment, and so on. What they don't want to see is the way culture colored the era when their scriptures were created.

Good biblical scholarship begins by studying the cultural situation when scriptures were written in search of their original intent, so that we can better discern what messages they may still have that are relevant for our lives. But if fundamentalists were to admit that their own scriptures are as culturally conditioned as everything else, they would lose the foundation of their certainties. Some scholars see evidence that St. Paul, for instance, had severe personal hang-ups about sex that may account for his harsh teachings about homosexuality and women. Many biblical scholars treat some of Paul's teachings as rants rather than revelations. But for fundamentalists, their scriptures fell straight from heaven in a leather-bound book, every jot and tittle intact.

Except for the illustrations I've added in laying out the agenda that the Fundamentalism Project discovered, you can't tell what religion, culture, or century I'm describing. The scholars discovered this a dozen years ago while they were presenting abstracts of their papers. Several noted that all their papers were sounding alike, reporting on “species” when studying the “genus” was called for, that there were strong family resemblances between all fundamentalisms, even when the religions had had no contact, no way to influence each other.
bold and italics added by yours truly.

Interesting psychology isn't it? All the people who do not function on the basis of that many fears are all in the same boat the world over. Now if that is not saying something for 'we're all the same'!
At any rate'd love reading the whole article;
The Fundamentalist Agenda
is absolutely natural, ancient, and powerful—but the liberal impulse makes us humane.

Labels: , ,


Blogger The Future Was Yesterday said...

Ingrid, you sure know how to make a grown man nearly cry with gratitude!:) I see so few efforts like this to even attempt to understand what it is destroying them, it gets depressing after while. I commend you greatly, because I can't hug and kiss you as I twirl you around in the air!:) (Ingrid's Husband: Figure of speech: please don't kill me:P) I get a lot of readers (none seem to know how to use comments, but can they ever cuss me out in email!)that ask "What's so bad about Religion? And I tell them nothing - IF you'd keep your religion to yourself and shut up about it!" You'd think I'd asked them to cut their legs off and swallow their tongue...(:

"What they don't want to see is the way culture colored the era when their scriptures were created."
Suppose that is because they are touted and quoted as "The Word Of God", and if they admitted a bunch of men wrote them, well.....:?:)

We see this even today. Ladies are all over my TV with their breasts showing the maximum allowed by TV rules: that being everything BUT the nipple. Dare anyone be so perverted as to show a dastardly nipple....ask CBS about Super Bowl shows. I don't want to make a joke out of this, but what is it about the female nipple that is horribly worse than the rest of the breast? I've known a few in my time, none have exploded in my face, none have damaged me for life emotionally, nor have I ever seen a nipple viciously attack and kill another human being! Now that I think about it, a Nipple has never lectured me on morality, either.

Thank You SO much once again. This post was better for my soul than a bowl of double fudge brownie, and I want you to know, this blog and this post is the very first to ever have that distinction!:)

11:43 PM  
Blogger thepoetryman said...

Great post! Fundamentalists will be an end to everything. We can ill afford to let them control the dialogue when it comes to this country (or any other for that matter.)...

This do as I do or burn in hell is, as George Carlin put it, and I paraphrase, the biggest crock of shit (hoax) ever pulled over mankind...

2:04 AM  
Blogger FranIAm said...

This is an outstanding post - thank you.

And while I do not always comment on his blog, I do read it all the time - The Future Was Yesterday stands alone in many ways with his unique and clear voice. I am always happy to see his comments pop up on my own blog.

And please note that I do write from the perspective of one who is both spiritual and religious and hopefully understands the difference.

And one who writes from the perspective that anyone who claims to know it all, usually knows very little indeed!

7:57 AM  
Blogger Linda Sama said...

excellent post

8:14 AM  
Blogger Mauigirl said...

I agree - fascinating and very telling. There must be some kind of deep need within man to constantly invent these fundamentalist rules no matter in which culture the religion falls.

12:03 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home